Categories · Lawsuits
· Federal/National
Lawsuits · Liggett
Organizations · Liggett
|
Jump to full article: Reuters, 2004-04-07
Intro: A federal judge on Wednesday rejected a plea by tobacco maker Liggett Group to remove the company from the government's $289 billion racketeering suit against the industry.
U.S. District Judge Gladys Kessler turned down Liggett's argument that the charges against the company should be dismissed from the case because the company broke ranks with the rest of the industry in 1997 and cooperated with government investigators. . . .
Kessler said the charges against Liggett should move ahead, noting that the government contends that Liggett still has not "come clean" because it "continues to assert that there never was a (racketeering) conspiracy and that if there was, it never participated in it."
Jump to full article » |
Categories · Lawsuits
USA, by State · Delaware
Lawsuits · Liggett
Organizations · Liggett
|
Page D02 Jump to full article: The Washington Post, 2001-09-15 Author: Compiled from reports by the Associated Press, Bloomberg News, Dow Jones News Service and Washington Post staff writers.
Intro: Liggett Group lost a court bid to force insurance companies to pay for the defense of the nation's fifth-largest cigarette maker in hundreds of tobacco-related lawsuits, as the company faces hundreds of injury claims from smokers. Liggett sued 33 insurance firms to recover hundreds of millions of dollars in defense and indemnity costs. The carriers argued that their policies include exclusion clauses that bar coverage of tobacco-related lawsuits. [This graph only]
Jump to full article » |
Categories · Lawsuits
USA, by State · Delaware
Lawsuits · Liggett
Organizations · Liggett
|
Jump to full article: Bloomberg News, 2001-09-14
Intro: Liggett Group Inc. lost a bid to force insurance companies to defend it from tobacco-related litigation, as the company faces mounting legal fees and millions of dollars in pending jury awards.
President Judge Henry DuPont Ridgely of the Delaware Superior Court found in favor of the insurance companies on nine summary judgment motions in lawsuits that covered policies held from 1970 to 2000, according to court documents.
Mitchell Lathrop, a partner at New York's Luce Forward Hamilton Scripps who represents the insurers, said Liggett tried to recover from 33 insurance companies, including Affiliated FM Insurance Co., Federal Insurance Co., Chubb Corp. and Zurich Financial Services. Liggett was seeking "hundreds of millions so far" in defense and indemnity, Lathrop said. This was the first time a tobacco company sued insurers to defend it, Lathrop said.
Jump to full article » |
Categories · Lawsuits
Lawsuits · Liggett
Organizations · Reynolds American
· Liggett
|
(Adds Reynolds reaction, details, background; PVS NEW YORK) Jump to full article: Reuters, 2000-03-02
Intro: A spokesman for Reynolds, maker of Camels with 25 percent of America's cigarette market, said the Winston-Salem, North Carolina-based group's lawyers had not seen the
Liggett lawsuit but denied Reynolds had violated price-fixing prohibitions.
``Our pricing policies are well within the limits of all laws and regulations that cover pricing,'' Reynolds spokesman John Singleton said.
Jump to full article » |
Categories · Lawsuits
USA, by State · New Jersey
Lawsuits · Liggett
Organizations · Reynolds American
· Liggett
|
Jump to full article: Reuters, 2000-03-02
Intro: Ligett's suit claims violations of federal antitrust laws,
specifically section 1 of the Sherman Act and Sections 4 and 16
of the Clayton Act, and various state laws. It alleges that RJR
''has entered into illegal pricing arrangements with retailers
that cause retailers to raise the price of non-RJR discount
cigarettes to the detriment of Liggett, other tobacco
manufacturers and consumers.'' . . Specifically, Liggett is challenging RJR's ``Every Day Low
Pricing'' program
Jump to full article » |
Categories · Lawsuits
Lawsuits · Liggett
Organizations · Liggett
|
Jump to full article: The Wall Street Journal Interactive Edition, 2000-02-07 Author: GORDON FAIRCLOUGH / Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
Intro: After receiving such a notice from Liggett, Hartford Financial Services Group Inc. filed a lawsuit asking a Connecticut state judge to rule that Liggett's tobacco-related legal liabilities aren't covered by its policies.
Joyce Willis, a spokeswoman for the insurance company, said that tobacco-related health claims are specifically excluded from the policies it sold Liggett. "There is no coverage," Ms. Willis said. "This isn't an issue."
Jump to full article » |
Categories · Lawsuits
Lawsuits · Liggett
Organizations · Liggett
|
Jump to full article: Bloomberg News, 2000-02-04 Author: Will Edwards
Intro: ``The other companies would rather not put themselves in the position that they're looking to insurance coverage to recoup product liability costs because that would imply that they lost,'' said Goldman Sachs analyst Marc Cohen. ``It would complicate their defenses and put insurers at odds with them in addition to the plaintiffs.''
Jump to full article » |
Categories · Lawsuits
Lawsuits · Liggett
Organizations · Liggett
|
Jump to full article: Business Wire, 2000-02-04
Intro: In response to
inquiries, Brooke Group Ltd. (NYSE: BGL) today confirmed that its
Liggett Group tobacco subsidiary recently made necessary filings to
preserve potential claims for insurance coverage. [This graph only]
Jump to full article » |