Categories · Lawsuits
Lawsuits · Ag
|
Jump to full article: New York Times, 1998-11-29 Author: SYLVIA NASAR
Intro: The problem, economists and legal experts who have studied the deal say, isn't that the damages won by the states are too small . . .
It's that 99 percent of the total settlement is really a disguised tax hike.
Taxing cigarettes more heavily may or may not be a good idea, the critics say, but labeling as "damages" what is effectively a sales tax is misleading and will create a boondoggle for trial lawyers and a windfall for the smaller tobacco companies.
Jump to full article » Quotes from this article:
By calling the settlement 'damages' it makes it seem reasonable to pay the lawyers a lot. If you called it taxes, you wouldn't expect to give lawyers a fraction of the tax.
Paul Klemperer, an economist at Oxford
University. Quoted in <i>Smokescreen: The Ifs and Buts of the Tobacco Settlement</i>
|