[Headlines Only] [Top Stories Only]
Categories
· Lawsuits
Lawsuits
· Ag

Smokescreen: The Ifs and Buts of the Tobacco Settlement 

Jump to full article: New York Times, 1998-11-29
Author: SYLVIA NASAR

Intro:

The problem, economists and legal experts who have studied the deal say, isn't that the damages won by the states are too small . . . It's that 99 percent of the total settlement is really a disguised tax hike.

Taxing cigarettes more heavily may or may not be a good idea, the critics say, but labeling as "damages" what is effectively a sales tax is misleading and will create a boondoggle for trial lawyers and a windfall for the smaller tobacco companies.

Jump to full article »


Quotes from this article:

By calling the settlement 'damages' it makes it seem reasonable to pay the lawyers a lot. If you called it taxes, you wouldn't expect to give lawyers a fraction of the tax.
Paul Klemperer, an economist at Oxford University. Quoted in <i>Smokescreen: The Ifs and Buts of the Tobacco Settlement</i>